Our Approach to Scheduling and Project Controls

A schedule is only useful if it reflects how the work will actually run. Our approach is built on that: programmes grounded in real productivity, sequenced with the people who execute the work, and supported by records that stand up when a project is tested. The background is tertiary mathematics and over 20 years on major mining, heavy industrial and infrastructure projects, applied to schedules that hold on site, not just at the approval gate.

Built With the People Who Run the Job

The best programme is developed from the ground up with the supervisors and leading hands who understand the constraints. We build work sequences with the execution team, set durations from verified productivity rates rather than a previous project's template, and level resource logic against what is actually available. The result is a programme the site recognises as theirs and will work to, not one imposed on it.

Realism Over Compliance

Passing a schedule health check is the floor, not the finish line. A programme can clear every DCMA schedule quality metric and still carry durations and assumptions that will not survive first contact with site. We test the realism behind the structure: whether the sequence matches how the work will run, whether hold points and approvals reflect how they actually function, and whether the critical path is defensible. Compliance gets the schedule through the gate. Realism gets the project delivered.

Built on the Record

Delay and disruption are won or lost on the quality of contemporaneous records. We build schedules that capture what happens as it happens, so progress, variance and cause are documented in real time rather than reconstructed after a dispute. Applying forensic thinking during delivery, not only after a claim arises, surfaces embedded delay while there is still time to act on it.

Independent and Delivered Directly

The work is independent and delivered directly, with senior attention on every engagement. That means analytical independence regardless of who engages us, and a programme shaped by your operation and its constraints, not a generic template.

These principles run through every service, from forensic delay analysis and schedule risk analysis to shutdown planning and Primavera P6 scheduling.

Talk to us about how this approach applies to your project.

Discuss Your Project